We are the most observed nation in the world. CCTV cameras line our streets, our emails are stored for years as is our IP traffic. Our location is tracked using our mobile phones, and this is stored for years too. Our credit cards record our behaviour and our cash point use correlates our position. If you travel in London, your car is tracked by it’s number plate for congestion charging enforcement and your Oyster card is tracked on every bus, tube and train you use. We have few secrets now.
My instinct is that this is harmful to us as a society, because freedom to choose can only be exercised when unobserved. Our elections are secret ballots for a reason. If you choose to fund animal rights groups, or to go on a demonstration, or to visit a sex shop then these are lawful activities and you should not be prevented from doing them for fear of surveillance. This is not fear of Government necessarily, but there are many people with access to these data, and any of them could be suborned, or could leak the information if they were interested enough. Even celebrities deserve privacy.
Following the horrific story of Madeleine McCann, I kept thinking though that the perpetrators would have been caught by now if this had happened in Britain. Their mobile phones, or their cars, or their faces would have given them away. The police would have issued CCTV pictures within hours. I have young children and the McCann’s are suffering our worst and greatest fear. I would not be human not to be glad that my children are in some ways at least safer precisely because of our level of surveillance.
How to reconcile these? I’d like to propose an idea swiped wholesale from Larry Niven - The Commission for Citizen Oversight. Instituted by Royal Charter and not answerable to Parliament directly, with a self-regulating board of trustees. It’s charter would be to protect citizen’s privacy by storing all of the data deemed personal and private, and they would have a say on what that data is. Mobile phone positioning records, Oyster card records, all output from police and council CCTV cameras. These things would be required by law to be encrypted immediately using the Citizen Oversight public key, and transmitted to their storage facility.
They would have complete discretion in when to release this information to investigating bodies, but would be required by charter to provide data for police investigations into very serious crimes and for reasons of national security. But that’s it. No trolling for celebrities, in fact no trolling at all, or joining up data to invent new suspects.
The British constitution is strangely good at these independent sorts of organisations, that answer only to themselves. In practice it would provide a far greater layer of protection than the disparate, unsecured storage used now that anyone with a mind to could get into (and I expect our own, and other nation’s, security services already have installed back doors in - I know I would if I were them).
This would protect our privacy, would improve national security, and yet would allow the use of the data in instances such as the taking of Madeleine McCann.
Update 20/05/2007. I’m closing comments on this post now, it’s all got way off topic.
Recent Comments